Local Opposition Mounts Against Proposed Times Square Casino Development, According to Poll

• Poll commissioned by anti-casino group
• Two-thirds of Times Square residents oppose Caesars gaming venue

---

A recent survey conducted by Tulchin Research indicates that a considerable majority of residents living in Midtown Manhattan and the West Side are against the proposed Caesars Palace project. This poll highlights the significant community backlash regarding the complexities of casino development in such a prominent area, signaling that local opposition remains a major hurdle for future gaming expansion in Times Square.

The poll, commissioned by the No Times Square Casino Coalition, reveals that two-thirds of the surveyed individuals are against the casino coming to the Theatre District. Half of them expressed that they are “strongly opposed” to the proposal. In stark contrast, only 24% of those polled support the plan, with just 6% strongly backing it. This indicates a dramatic disparity between supporters and opponents, with a 9 to 1 ratio favouring opposition.

“Support for the casino is severely lacking; voters who ‘strongly oppose’ outnumber those who are in favour by a staggering margin,” noted Tulchin.

The survey comes at a critical juncture as a community advisory committee (CAC) is set to vote on the casino’s future this month. These committees have a significant role in reporting recommendations to the New York Gaming Facilities Location Board (GFLB).

Political Implications of the Poll

With the upcoming mayoral election in full swing, the findings from Tulchin’s poll should be of keen interest to local politicians. The data suggests that constituents are unlikely to support candidates who are pro-casino.

This overwhelming resistance is observed across multiple demographic groups. However, it is particularly pronounced among women—who oppose the casino 73% to 17%—and seniors, of whom 74% are against the idea compared with only 16% in support.

Many respondents believe that introducing a casino would lead to increased crime (77%) and make Times Square a less desirable area for living and working, while also contributing to further congestion in an already busy district.

Community Concerns and Opposition

Despite commitments from Caesars Entertainment, Roc Nation, and SL Green to create thousands of jobs and invest billions in local taxes and community projects, opposition remains strong. The No Times Square Casino Coalition comprises various community groups, local enterprises, and theatre unions.

In summary, the community’s adamant refusal to support the casino stems from widespread concerns about heightened crime rates, increased congestion, and a deteriorating quality of life. This opposition is deeply rooted and has persisted despite efforts from casino proponents to alter public opinion.

As Tulchin concludes, “The message for elected officials is clear: endorsing this project is not in line with the voters’ wishes.” It appears that the push for a casino in Times Square has a long uphill battle ahead.